Zain Dana Harper

Plain index The map

research

Olivetti advertisements: overprint, tile field, code mosaic, mosaic as flow

Post by Rron Berisha (@rronberishagrit), 2026-10-25

What it is, and who made it

  1. "De A à Z" (French): a giant A crossed by Z strokes in translucent inks.
  2. Divisumma, signed by Herbert Bayer: ribbons of numbered colour tiles curling over a grey checker sheet.
  3. Divisumma 26: a hexagon filled with the digit string 1234567890 in three face colours on black.
  4. Elettrosumma 22: an isometric field of blocks with scattered digits.

Parts, layer by layer

1. De A à Z. Paper #fcf7eb. Inks measured alone: red #eb4324, cyan #04b2dd, yellow #fcc603, green #07ac3d, black #1a1b22. Every overlap is darker than both inks: transparent overprint. Ideal multiply gets lightness, misses hue by 14 to 21. Type: one A and parts of Z as flat planes; French body copy in a slab serif.

2. Elettrosumma 22. Edge-orientation peaks 35° and 143° (secondary 44°, 152°) from horizontal: steeper than isometric 30° (inferred dimetric, hand-drawn). Faces by area: coloured tops 0.235, light-grey sides 0.445, mid-grey sides 0.118, black 0.066, paper 0.134; light to mid side ratio 3.8 to 1. Eight top inks (observed). Single bold digits in the gaps.

3. Divisumma 26. Faces: pink, white, ochre on black. Line pitch 20 px of 1972 in the white face (autocorrelation 0.91); 19 px in the pink. Glyph advance about 12 px (weak, 0.51). Face boundaries near 127° to 145°. The string breaks: '13345' for '12345' in at least two lines (observed).

4. Bayer, Divisumma. Class shares: paper 0.19, light grey 0.28, mid grey 0.09, dark grey 0.04, black 0.20, colour 0.19. The S ribbon's bottom edge curvature runs +0.0087 to −0.0059 per px with an inflection near x 800; tightest radius 115 px (about 8% of the width); apparent height 92 to 399 px. Tile widths 88 to 89 px in the flat row and 26 to 47 px where the ribbon turns. Black teardrops fill the curls. Operators and digits ride the tiles and float on the grid.

The framework behind it

One framework seen three ways. Mosaic is the discretisation (blocks, glyph cells, tiles). Overprint is the optics: each ink a sheet with a transmission; overlap the product. Flow is the motion: tiles carried by a bending surface, the flow made visible by how tiles foreshorten. The fourth sheet adds error as grain: the misprinted digit proves the field is text.

The same idea in distant fields

Dual edge

Mosaic as flow makes numbers look alive and friendly: Olivetti sold calculators with it. The same move can make figures look more orderly than the data behind them. Overprint can hide one layer inside another; a reading surface must keep each sheet separable. Copying Olivetti or Bayer forms directly would be a literal copy; the canon asks for the framework, not the look.

Measured

Image 1

  • #ded8cb 34%
  • #917063 18%
  • #b2b4a6 18%
  • #2c3842 12%
  • #dad3c3 12%
  • #ddd288 5%
Mean saturation
0.186
Contrast
0.749
Edge density
0.057
Dominant wavelength
0.0879
Edge softness
1.44
Mean saturation
0.161
Contrast
0.376
Mean saturation
0.16
Contrast
0.574

Image 2

  • #e1e2e3 22%
  • #080b0a 21%
  • #a29da3 19%
  • #c1c0c2 14%
  • #ec8a34 12%
  • #535566 12%
Mean saturation
0.209
Contrast
0.937
Edge density
0.043
Dominant wavelength
0.1573
Edge softness
2.76
Mean saturation
0.394
Contrast
0.978

Image 3

  • #f9f4e8 33%
  • #231f25 28%
  • #08a344 14%
  • #e73c20 14%
  • #05add9 7%
  • #f9c70d 5%
Mean saturation
0.465
Contrast
0.897
Edge density
0.032
Dominant wavelength
0.0131
Edge softness
4.82
Mean saturation
0.441
Contrast
0.904
Mean saturation
0.527
Contrast
0.883
Mean saturation
0.235
Contrast
0.899

Image 4

  • #e2e2e3 22%
  • #070b09 21%
  • #a29da3 19%
  • #c1c0c2 14%
  • #ed8a33 12%
  • #535566 12%
Mean saturation
0.206
Contrast
0.937
Edge density
0.044
Dominant wavelength
0.1573
Edge softness
2.86
Mean saturation
0.204
Contrast
0.974

Image 5

  • #080808 69%
  • #eeeae3 7%
  • #a47846 7%
  • #9d8b8f 7%
  • #d9afc1 6%
  • #5f4732 4%
Mean saturation
0.11
Contrast
0.963
Edge density
0.223
Dominant wavelength
0.0071
Edge softness
0.87

Image 6

  • #ded8cb 35%
  • #917063 18%
  • #b2b4a6 18%
  • #2b3842 12%
  • #dad3c3 12%
  • #ddd287 5%
Mean saturation
0.185
Contrast
0.749
Edge density
0.057
Dominant wavelength
0.0879
Edge softness
1.44

Concepts

All studies