Figure 1. A report, a baseline, and a change are different records

Prospective studies separate retrospective perceived growth from measured change, while keeping each event, sample, interval, and outcome distinct.

Figure 1. A report, a baseline, and a change are different records. Prospective studies separate retrospective perceived growth from measured change, while keeping each event, sample, interval, and outcome distinct.
SourceDesign and denominatorWhat was comparedObserved relationMain non-proof
S2Two-month prospective study; n=122 event subgroupPTGI retrospective report versus measured pre-to-post domain changeGenerally unrelatedNo claim that growth never occurs
S3Two-wave student study; n=282 baseline; n=219 to 221 raw follow-up; n=214 to 218 full-sample analytic; 66 raw event reports; n=61 to 64 analytic event subsetPerceived PTG, perceived general growth, and measured pre-to-post changePerceived PTG was not significantly related to the other two change recordsNo generalization beyond the small student event subgroup
S4Stem-cell-transplant study; n=187 first; n=157 second; n=91 thirdPTGI at follow-up versus repeated domain measuresWeak composite relation; three of five paired domains not significantly relatedNo cross-trauma prevalence claim; attrition remains material
S7Three waves over six months; Wave 1 n=804; 32,099 daily assessmentsPerceived PTG versus later current-standing and aggregated daily-state changeDid not predict later observed change in the tested modelsNo conclusion about longer horizons or every subgroup
Scope
Four prospective or measurement-burst studies published from 2009 through 2024
Units
Participants, completed questionnaires, experience-sampling assessments, and direction-of-result labels
Denominator
Study-specific only; the rows must not be summed: S2 n=122; S3 baseline n=282, 219 to 221 raw follow-up returns, 214 to 218 full-sample analytic comparisons, 66 raw event reports, and n=61 to 64 in trauma-subset analytic comparisons; S4 n=187 first, 157 second, and 91 third; S7 Wave 1 n=804 and 32,099 assessments
Date
Sources first published online from 2009-06-08 through 2023-07-20, with S7 in a 2024 issue; observed 2026-09-05
Transformation
Findings are paraphrased with study-specific direction labels; no pooling, standardization, interpolation, or cross-study ranking is performed
Uncertainty
Events, samples, follow-up windows, measures, attrition, and statistical models differ across rows
Limitations
The matrix is illustrative rather than exhaustive, and none of the samples represents every kind of adverse event or recovery context.
Does not prove
The figure does not show that positive change never happens, determine whether a particular report is accurate, predict any person's recovery, or tell a reader what care to seek.

Sources

  1. Does Self-Reported Posttraumatic Growth Reflect Genuine Positive Change?. Psychological Science. Published 2009-06-08; observed 2026-09-05.
  2. Perceptions of Change after a Trauma and Perceived Posttraumatic Growth: A Prospective Examination. Behavioral Sciences. Published 2019-01-15; observed 2026-09-05.
  3. Retrospective and prospective measures of post-traumatic growth reflect different processes. BMC Psychiatry. Published 2021-01-11; observed 2026-09-05.
  4. Does Perceived Posttraumatic Growth Predict Observed Changes in Current-Standing and State Posttraumatic Growth?. Clinical Psychological Science. Published 2023-07-20; observed 2026-09-05.