Five records, bounded observation points

A scope matrix separates legal process, OpenAI's company report, Hugging Face host telemetry, the METR and Redwood investigation, and vendor remediation. Concise visual labels map to fuller source and engagement boundaries in the evidence notes.

The five evidence lanes answer different questions and carry different access, support, editorial-control, payment, and attribution boundaries.

Semantic data for Five records, bounded observation points
RowColumnRecordState
AccessHF telemetryHost systemsVerified
AccessMETR + RedwoodHost-controlled accessCaution
AccessLegal processCompulsory requestsCaution
AccessOpenAI reportFirst-party systemsCaution
AccessVendor recordPublished recordsCaution
CollectionHF telemetryHost logs + forensicsVerified
CollectionMETR + RedwoodSupplied datasetsCaution
CollectionLegal processOfficial legal recordsCaution
CollectionOpenAI reportInternal investigationCaution
CollectionVendor recordVendor publicationsCaution
Known gapHF telemetryIncomplete recoveryCaution
Known gapMETR + RedwoodNo direct system queryCaution
Known gapLegal processNo adjudicationCaution
Known gapOpenAI reportNo independent replicationCaution
Known gapVendor recordNo deployment proofCaution
Host controlHF telemetryHost controls recordsVerified
Host controlMETR + RedwoodOpenAI redaction + editsCaution
Host controlLegal processPublic records onlyCaution
Host controlOpenAI reportSource + host partyCaution
Host controlVendor recordPublished recordsCaution
InferenceHF telemetryHost motive accountCaution
InferenceMETR + RedwoodBehavioral analysisCaution
InferenceLegal processAllegations onlyCaution
InferenceOpenAI reportFirst-party accountCaution
InferenceVendor recordNone inferredUnavailable or historical
ObservationHF telemetryRecovered host activityVerified
ObservationMETR + RedwoodSupplied-data patternsCaution
ObservationLegal processProcess + deadlineVerified
ObservationOpenAI reportActivity + responseCaution
ObservationVendor recordPublished remediationCaution
PaymentHF telemetryNot applicableUnavailable or historical
PaymentMETR + RedwoodMETR: no OpenAI paymentCaution
PaymentLegal processNot applicableUnavailable or historical
PaymentOpenAI reportNo payment by reportCaution
PaymentVendor recordNot applicableUnavailable or historical
PeriodHF telemetryJul 9 to Jul 13Verified
PeriodMETR + RedwoodJun 26 to Jul 13Caution
PeriodLegal processAug 20 to Sep 14Caution
PeriodOpenAI reportMay 8 to Aug 26Caution
PeriodVendor recordJul 27 to Aug 25Caution
Research supportHF telemetryNone statedUnavailable or historical
Research supportMETR + Redwood≈$400k free API creditsCaution
Research supportLegal processNone statedUnavailable or historical
Research supportOpenAI reportAPI-credit providerCaution
Research supportVendor recordNone statedUnavailable or historical
UnitHF telemetryActions + assetsVerified
UnitMETR + RedwoodAgents + recordsCaution
UnitLegal process16 record requestsCaution
UnitOpenAI reportSystems + controlsCaution
UnitVendor recordAdvisories + fixesCaution
Five records, bounded observation points A scope matrix separates legal process, OpenAI's company report, Hugging Face host telemetry, the METR and Redwood investigation, and vendor remediation. Concise visual labels map to fuller source and engagement boundaries in the evidence notes. The five evidence lanes answer different questions and carry different access, support, editorial-control, payment, and attribution boundaries. HF telemetry METR + Redwood Legal process OpenAI report Vendor recordAccess Host systems Host-controlled access Compulsory requests First-party systems Published records Collection Host logs + forensics Supplied datasets Official legal records Internal investigation Vendor publications Known gap Incomplete recovery No direct system query No adjudication No independent replication No deployment proof Host control Host controls records OpenAI redaction + edits Public records only Source + host party Published records Inference Host motive account Behavioral analysis Allegations only First-party account None inferred Observation Recovered host activity Supplied-data patterns Process + deadline Activity + response Published remediation Payment Not applicable METR: no OpenAI payment Not applicable No payment by report Not applicable Period Jul 9 to Jul 13 Jun 26 to Jul 13 Aug 20 to Sep 14 May 8 to Aug 26 Jul 27 to Aug 25 Research support None stated ≈$400k free API credits None stated API-credit provider None stated Unit Actions + assets Agents + records 16 record requests Systems + controls Advisories + fixes Cells use text, pattern, and outline in addition to color.
Sources
Retrieved
Units
qualitative scope fields
Transformations
  • Keep named units inside their source cells and do not aggregate across columns.
  • METR + Redwood is the joint investigation; the Redwood URL is a mirror of that report, not a second corroborating investigation.
  • Preserve each source lane's terminology and attribution without assigning a score.
  • Render every missing or bounded detail as an explicit gap rather than an inferred absence.
  • The visual label ≈$400k free API credits means approximately $400,000 in free GPT-5.6 Sol credits and raised rate limits supplied for analysis; it does not mean cash payment.
  • The visual label METR: no OpenAI payment means METR reports that it did not take payment from OpenAI.
  • The visual label OpenAI redaction + edits means OpenAI could redact non-public information and supplied additional feedback that led to edits in structure, emphasis, clarity, and tone.
Uncertainty
Cells use short visual labels so every term remains legible. The source-linked evidence notes preserve the full engagement meanings. Source access and publication dates differ, and MR-2 mirrors the joint report rather than adding another investigation.
What this figure does not prove
The matrix does not rank credibility, merge incompatible units, resolve disputed interpretations, or convert allegations into findings.